Use cases · Corporate groups

Consolidated financials across many companies and systems — in seconds.

A corporate-group question answered across disconnected systems — with the numbers, the method, and the honest caveats. Figures are illustrative (synthetic data).

Use-case · Corporate groups · Consolidation

One question across 18 subsidiaries. A consolidated answer — eliminations and all — in seconds.

A group controller asks in plain language. The AccuraSee Gateway reads each subsidiary's ledger — three different ERPs, three charts of accounts — maps them to the group model, removes intercompany transactions, and returns one consolidated figure with every entity's contribution cited.

Many systems, one model
18 subsidiary ledgers · 3 ERPs
Group chart of accounts · one mapping
Intercompany register
AccuraSee Gateway
map · eliminate · cite · per-user audit
One reconciled answer
Consolidated EBIT — eliminations applied, per entity cited
18 → 1
subsidiaries on three ERPs, mapped to one governed group model
Days → sec
from a multi-day manual close question to an instant, sourced answer
1,9 MSEK
intercompany sales the manual spreadsheet missed eliminating — caught
1 definition
every metric defined once; no drift between entities or reports
EntityLocal EBITIntercompany adj.Group contribution
Demobolaget Sverige AB14,2 MSEK−1,113,1 MSEK
Demobolaget Norge AS8,6 MSEK−0,58,1 MSEK
Demobolaget Tech AB3,4 MSEK−0,33,1 MSEK
+ 15 more entities
Group EBIT (eliminations applied)−1,941,7 MSEK

Honest by design: the Gateway assists the controller and shows its working — it doesn't replace formal sign-off. "Demobolaget Group" and all figures are illustrative (synthetic data).

Use-case · Corporate groups · Intercompany reconciliation

When entities move, the old balances don't move with them.

A Nordic property group runs 150+ wholly-owned entities. After each restructuring, intercompany balances quietly stay attached to the wrong counterparty — a former parent, a sister company, a divested entity. The Gateway maps the current ownership tree against every live balance in the general ledger and surfaces every pair that breaks the parent–subsidiary rule, so finance can act at close instead of hunting through history.

Data sources Ownership tree (structure + move dates) Counterparty balances (general ledger) Group consolidation register
AccuraSee Gatewaymap · match pairs · apply the rule · flag
Output Every balance that breaks the parent–subsidiary rule — flagged, with a proposed fix
To re-route 3.4 MSEK 3 counterparty pairs break the parent–subsidiary rule.
150+
entities mapped in one pass against the live tree
>1.2M
counterparty transaction rows scanned

The group, mapped — and where balances sit wrong

Illustrative slice of the tree · synthetic data
0.8M · sisters re-route via M 1.4M · prior parent 1.2M · out of group Parent M group top Entity C moved 2024 Sub A subsidiary Sub B subsidiary Sub F subsidiary Sub D subsidiary Former Parent X left 2024 Entity E divested
Ownership (parent → subsidiary) Balance that breaks the rule Proposed re-route
5 pairs checked · 2 follow the rule · 3 flagged · 3.4 MSEK to re-route
Sub A ↔ Sub B
Sisters under Parent M
0.8 MSEK
Route the balance via the common parent, not directly.
Entity C ↔ former Parent X
Moved to a new parent in 2024
1.4 MSEK
Re-point to the current parent; clear the balance against the prior one.
Sub D ↔ Entity E
Entity E divested last year
1.2 MSEK
Counterparty is outside the group — settle or reclassify.

Honest by design: the Gateway maps, flags and proposes re-routing — finance makes every accounting decision and books the entries. Figures are illustrative (synthetic data); "a Nordic property group" is an anonymized scenario, not a named customer. Queries run inside the group's own EU tenant, logged with a full per-user audit trail.

Have a question in corporate groups your systems can't answer today?

Bring us a real one. We'll scope a low-risk pre-study and show you exactly what's answerable on your data.

Ask your business data anything. Get an answer in seconds.

Start with a discovery call — we'll scope a low-risk pre-study and show you what's answerable on your data.

What to expect: a 30-minute call · we map your data sources · a live answer on your data — no pressure.