Net operating income, reconciled across the books, the contracts and the meters.
A real-estate question answered across disconnected systems — with the numbers, the method, and the honest caveats. Figures are illustrative (synthetic data).
One question. The AI reads the books, the contracts and the invoices — and finds the money you forgot to bill.
Net operating income is down even though the property is fully let. You just ask why — and the AI pulls four disconnected sources, cross-references them, names the leak, and hands your property manager the fix.
-
1
Decompose the NOI drop
Splits driftnetto by cost line. One line dominates: electricity, +560 tkr year-on-year.
General ledger -
2
Read the lease contracts
Finds 2 of 9 tenants are contractually liable for their own electricity (sub-metered recharge clause).
Signed leases (PDF) -
3
Audit the sent invoices
Checks every invoice to those 2 tenants — the electricity recharge line is missing for 7 months.
Sent invoices (AR) -
4
Quantify & assign
Adds up the un-billed recharges, sizes the NOI hit, and writes a task list to recover it.
Synthesis
The paradox isn't operations — it's revenue leakage. Costs rose because electricity went up, but two tenants who are contractually billed for that electricity were never invoiced for it. The "missing" NOI is real money sitting un-billed.
NOI (driftnetto) trend
· the paradoxQuarterly net operating income, Vårberg Centrum. Occupancy held at 100% the whole period — yet NOI fell.
What moved the NOI
· cost bridgeYear-on-year walk from last year's NOI to this year's. Rent and other costs barely moved — electricity is the whole story, and most of it should have been billed back.
Electricity the two tenants consumed and owe under their leases, but were never invoiced for across the last 7 months — recoverable in full, and the single largest piece of the NOI gap.
Electricity: paid out vs billed back
· the gapFor the two recharge-liable tenants only — what the property paid the grid vs what it invoiced the tenants.
The evidence, side by side
· contract clause vs invoices sentTwo named leases. The contract says the tenant pays; the invoice history says they were never charged.
| Tenant / lease | What the contract says | What was invoiced | Owed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nordica Café AB Lease #VC-204 · LOA 240 m² |
Tenant pays own electricity by sub-meter, invoiced monthly. Lease §6.3 · p.4 | No el-line · 7 mo | 142 000 kr |
| Tandvård Syd HB Lease #VC-118 · LOA 165 m² |
Tenant reimburses actual electricity at cost, billed quarterly. Lease §5.1 · addendum B | No el-line · 2 qtrs | 106 000 kr |
Action list — handed to the property manager
TWAssigned to Terese WidströmHonest by design: figures are sample data — realistic and internally consistent, not a real property. Every number above is traced to its source: the general ledger (driftnetto by account), the signed lease PDFs (recharge clauses, cited by section), the sent-invoice / AR records (the missing electricity lines), and sub-meter readings — all read in your own tenant, permission-aware and logged per user. The AI quantifies and proposes; a person reviews and books.
A complete DD package in hours, not days.
When a buyer sends a due-diligence checklist, someone has to hunt every document across four disconnected systems before the sale can move forward. AccuraSee Gateway interprets the checklist, retrieves each underlying document from wherever it lives, cross-checks figures across sources, and surfaces every mismatch and gap — so a person reviews a complete, cited package instead of assembling one.
The package, item by item
Buyer's DD checklist · synthetic dataHonest by design: AccuraSee Gateway assembles and flags — it doesn't decide. A person reviews the complete package and approves it before it reaches the buyer. All figures are illustrative (synthetic data) — a plausible scenario, not a specific transaction or customer.
Catch invoice drift before it silently compounds.
Technical-management contracts spell out every rate, scope and cap — but invoice lines rarely get checked against them systematically. AccuraSee Gateway reads both sides and flags every deviation, line by line, before it becomes a habit.
Line by line — contract against invoice
One supplier shown · synthetic dataHonest by design: the assistant flags deviations and cites the relevant contract clause — it never withholds payment, raises a dispute, or contacts a supplier. Every flagged line goes to a person who decides whether to reclaim, query or accept. Figures are illustrative (synthetic data); no real customer or supplier is identified.
Have a question in real estate your systems can't answer today?
Bring us a real one. We'll scope a low-risk pre-study and show you exactly what's answerable on your data.
Ask your business data anything. Get an answer in seconds.
Start with a discovery call — we'll scope a low-risk pre-study and show you what's answerable on your data.
What to expect: a 30-minute call · we map your data sources · a live answer on your data — no pressure.